
Essential DevOps Rules
- Published on
- Authors
- Author
- Ram Simran G
- twitter @rgarimella0124
DevOps engineering is one of those fields where theory meets brutal reality at 3 AM when your production systems decide to have an existential crisis. After years of being woken up by alerts, debugging cryptic error messages, and learning from spectacular failures, the DevOps community has distilled some fundamental truths that separate the seasoned professionals from those still figuring things out.
Here are 35 battle-tested rules that will accelerate your journey from DevOps beginner to someone who can sleep peacefully at night (most of the time).
The Automation & Monitoring Commandments
• Focus on the things that get you paged at 3 AM - those are the processes you should automate first
Why this matters: Your sleep schedule is the ultimate priority queue for automation tasks. If something is important enough to wake you up in the middle of the night, it’s important enough to automate properly.
Real-world application: Start by listing every incident that has pulled you out of bed in the past six months. Database connection failures? Disk space alerts? Failed deployments? These aren’t just inconveniences—they’re your roadmap to better automation.
Pro tip: Create a “3 AM automation backlog” and tackle the most frequent offenders first. Your future self (and your family) will thank you.
• Stop monitoring every CPU spike. Focus on what impacts your users and revenue
Why this matters: Monitoring everything is like having a car alarm that goes off every time someone walks by—eventually, you stop paying attention to the important alerts.
The principle: Monitor outcomes, not just outputs. A CPU spike that doesn’t affect user experience or business metrics is just noise. Focus on:
- User-facing errors and response times
- Revenue-impacting system failures
- Customer experience metrics
- Business-critical process completions
Implementation strategy: Start with your service level objectives (SLOs) and work backward. What metrics actually matter to your users and business? Build your monitoring around those, not around every system resource you can measure.
• An alert should require immediate action; otherwise, it should be a log or dashboard metric
Why this rule exists: Alert fatigue is real and dangerous. When everything is urgent, nothing is urgent.
The litmus test: Before creating any alert, ask yourself: “If this fired at 2 AM, would I need to get out of bed to fix it?” If the answer is no, it belongs in a dashboard or log, not in your alert system.
Best practices:
- Critical alerts: Immediate action required (system down, data loss)
- Warning alerts: Action needed within business hours
- Info notifications: Dashboard metrics and trend analysis
- Debug logs: Everything else
The Failure & Recovery Philosophy
• Your systems will break. Plan for failure, not perfection
The harsh reality: It’s not a matter of if your systems will fail, but when and how spectacularly. Embracing this mindset shifts your focus from preventing all failures (impossible) to handling them gracefully (achievable).
Design principles:
- Assume every component will fail at the worst possible moment
- Build redundancy at every critical layer
- Design for graceful degradation rather than catastrophic failure
- Create systems that fail fast and recover quickly
Cultural shift: Stop asking “How do we prevent this from failing?” and start asking “When this fails, how do we minimize impact and recover quickly?”
• Before you hit deploy, know exactly how to roll back. Test it too - a broken rollback plan is worse than no plan
The deployment paradox: The confidence to move forward comes from knowing you can move backward quickly.
Essential rollback requirements:
- Document the exact rollback procedure before deployment
- Test rollback procedures in staging environments
- Automate rollback processes where possible
- Set maximum rollback time limits (if you can’t roll back in X minutes, you need to fix forward)
- Have a communication plan for rollback scenarios
Real-world example: Blue-green deployments, feature flags, and database migration strategies that work in both directions are your friends here.
• Run good post-mortems that focus on improving systems, not blaming people. Pointing fingers is fun until they point back at you
The post-mortem philosophy: Every failure is a learning opportunity disguised as a crisis.
Effective post-mortem structure:
- Timeline of events (facts only, no blame)
- Root cause analysis (usually multiple contributing factors)
- System improvements to prevent similar issues
- Process improvements to catch issues earlier
- Action items with owners and deadlines
Cultural considerations: Create a blameless culture where people feel safe to report problems and mistakes. The goal is system improvement, not punishment.
The Security & Best Practices Doctrine
• Never store secrets in code repositories, even private ones
Why this is non-negotiable: Code repositories have a way of becoming less private over time. Developers change companies, repositories get forked, and backups exist in places you’ve forgotten about.
Secret management best practices:
- Use dedicated secret management tools (HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault)
- Environment variables for containerized applications
- Rotate secrets regularly and automatically
- Audit secret access and usage
- Never commit secrets, even in private repositories
The “even private repos” rule: Today’s private repository is tomorrow’s open-source project or security audit discovery.
• Complex security is bad security. If your security makes things harder, people will find ways around it
The usability principle: Security that’s difficult to use correctly will be used incorrectly or bypassed entirely.
Design principles:
- Make secure practices the easiest option
- Automate security wherever possible
- Provide clear documentation and training
- Regular security reviews and improvements
- Balance security with developer productivity
Real-world impact: Overly complex authentication systems lead to password sharing. Difficult deployment processes lead to direct production access. Hard-to-use security tools lead to shadow IT solutions.
The Data & Backup Commandments
• Everyone says they have backups. The real question is: when did you last test them?
The backup reality check: Untested backups are just wishful thinking with storage costs.
Backup testing strategy:
- Regular restore tests in isolated environments
- Document and time your restore procedures
- Test partial restores, not just full system restores
- Verify data integrity after restoration
- Test restores under time pressure (simulated emergency conditions)
The 3-2-1 rule: 3 copies of important data, on 2 different media types, with 1 copy offsite.
• Back up everything regularly, but also test your restore process
Beyond just having backups: The ability to restore quickly and correctly is often more important than the backup itself.
Comprehensive backup strategy:
- Automated, regular backups of all critical data
- Multiple restore points (hourly, daily, weekly, monthly)
- Geographically distributed backup storage
- Documented restore procedures for different scenarios
- Regular disaster recovery drills
Testing scenarios: Complete system failure, partial data corruption, accidental deletion, and time-critical recovery situations.
The Development & Deployment Wisdom
• Treat Infrastructure Like Software. Test it, version it. DRY it.
Infrastructure as Code (IaC) principles: Your infrastructure should be as well-managed as your application code.
Best practices:
- Version control all infrastructure definitions
- Use automated testing for infrastructure changes
- Apply DRY (Don’t Repeat Yourself) principles to infrastructure code
- Code reviews for infrastructure changes
- Automated deployment pipelines for infrastructure
Tools and approaches: Terraform, CloudFormation, Ansible, and other IaC tools should be treated with the same rigor as application development.
• Make small, frequent changes instead of large, infrequent ones
The deployment philosophy: Small changes are easier to test, deploy, and rollback. Large changes are exponentially more risky.
Implementation strategy:
- Break large features into smaller, deployable chunks
- Use feature flags to decouple deployment from release
- Implement continuous integration and deployment
- Maintain backward compatibility during transitions
- Monitor and validate each small change before the next
Risk reduction: Small changes mean smaller blast radius when things go wrong.
• Build a proper test environment before touching production
The testing hierarchy: Development → Staging → Production, with proper data and configuration management at each level.
Test environment requirements:
- Mirror production architecture as closely as possible
- Use production-like data (anonymized/sanitized)
- Implement the same monitoring and alerting
- Test deployment and rollback procedures
- Load testing and performance validation
Common pitfalls: “It works on my machine” syndrome, configuration drift between environments, and insufficient test data.
• Design systems assuming components will fail
Resilience by design: Build systems that continue operating even when individual components fail.
Design patterns:
- Circuit breakers for external service calls
- Retry logic with exponential backoff
- Graceful degradation when services are unavailable
- Health checks and automatic failover
- Redundancy at every critical layer
Chaos engineering: Intentionally introduce failures to test system resilience.
The Knowledge & Learning Philosophy
• That error you’re seeing? Someone’s already solved it on Stack Overflow or GitHub issues
The debugging shortcut: Most problems you encounter have been solved by someone else. Learning to search effectively is a crucial skill.
Effective search strategies:
- Use specific error messages and codes
- Include relevant technology stack information
- Check official documentation and GitHub issues
- Look for recent solutions (technology changes quickly)
- Understand the solution, don’t just copy-paste
Building knowledge: Keep a personal knowledge base of solutions to problems you’ve encountered.
• Learn to read logs like a detective. The answer is usually buried in there somewhere
Log analysis skills: Logs are the primary source of truth for system behavior and problems.
Log reading techniques:
- Understand log levels and their meanings
- Use log aggregation tools (ELK stack, Splunk, etc.)
- Search for patterns, not just specific errors
- Correlate logs across different systems and time periods
- Understand normal vs. abnormal log patterns
Log management: Proper log collection, storage, and analysis infrastructure is essential.
• Teaching Others Accelerates Your Learning
The teaching principle: Explaining concepts to others forces you to understand them more deeply.
Benefits of teaching:
- Identifies gaps in your own knowledge
- Reinforces your understanding through repetition
- Builds your professional reputation and network
- Contributes to team knowledge and capabilities
- Develops communication and leadership skills
Opportunities: Internal documentation, team presentations, mentoring, blog posts, and conference talks.
• Learn to Explain Technical Concepts to Non-Technical People
The communication bridge: DevOps engineers often need to communicate with business stakeholders who don’t have technical backgrounds.
Communication techniques:
- Use analogies and metaphors
- Focus on business impact, not technical details
- Avoid jargon and acronyms
- Use visual aids and diagrams
- Provide concrete examples and scenarios
Business alignment: Understanding how technical decisions impact business outcomes is crucial for career advancement.
The Productivity & Professional Development Rules
• Context Switching Is the Productivity Killer
The focus principle: Constant interruptions and task switching dramatically reduce productivity and increase error rates.
Strategies for minimizing context switching:
- Batch similar tasks together
- Set dedicated time blocks for deep work
- Use tools to manage interruptions (Slack status, calendar blocks)
- Prioritize ruthlessly
- Delegate or automate routine tasks
Team coordination: Establish team agreements about communication and interruption protocols.
• Physical Health Affects Technical Performance
The holistic approach: Your physical and mental health directly impact your ability to solve technical problems and make good decisions.
Health considerations:
- Regular exercise and movement
- Adequate sleep (especially important for on-call rotations)
- Proper nutrition and hydration
- Stress management techniques
- Work-life balance
On-call health: Irregular sleep schedules and high-stress incidents can seriously impact health and performance.
• Build Your Professional Network Before You Need It
The networking principle: Professional relationships are most valuable when they’re not transactional.
Network building strategies:
- Attend industry conferences and meetups
- Contribute to open source projects
- Participate in online communities
- Share knowledge through writing and speaking
- Maintain relationships with former colleagues
Long-term thinking: Invest in relationships when you don’t need anything, so they’re available when you do.
The Pragmatic Engineering Principles
• New tools are shiny, but boring tech pays the bills. Don’t rewrite your stable systems just because Docker has a new feature
The stability principle: Mature, proven technologies are often better choices than cutting-edge alternatives for critical systems.
Technology selection criteria:
- Proven track record in production environments
- Strong community support and documentation
- Long-term maintenance and support commitments
- Team expertise and learning curve
- Business requirements and constraints
Innovation balance: Use new technologies for non-critical systems first, then gradually introduce them to more important systems.
• Don’t try to reinvent the wheel. Take what is already there and build on top of it
The efficiency principle: Standing on the shoulders of giants is faster and more reliable than building everything from scratch.
Implementation strategies:
- Use established frameworks and libraries
- Leverage cloud services for non-differentiating functionality
- Adopt industry standard practices and patterns
- Contribute to existing open source projects rather than creating new ones
- Focus innovation on your unique business value
When to build vs. buy: Build when it’s your competitive advantage, buy/use when it’s commodity functionality.
• ‘But It Works on My Machine’ will not get you anywhere
The consistency principle: Development, testing, and production environments must be as similar as possible.
Solutions for environment consistency:
- Containerization (Docker, etc.)
- Infrastructure as Code
- Standardized development environments
- Automated environment provisioning
- Configuration management tools
Cultural shift: Move from “works on my machine” to “works in all environments.”
The Documentation & Communication Essentials
• Version control isn’t just for code. Put your scripts, configs, and docs in git - you’ll need them when things break
The everything-in-git principle: If it’s important enough to create, it’s important enough to version control.
What belongs in version control:
- Infrastructure as Code definitions
- Configuration files and templates
- Deployment and maintenance scripts
- Documentation and runbooks
- Database migration scripts
- Monitoring and alerting configurations
Benefits: Change tracking, collaboration, rollback capabilities, and historical analysis.
• Write things down. Your 3 AM self won’t remember what your 3 PM self was thinking
The documentation imperative: Clear, up-to-date documentation is essential for system maintenance and knowledge transfer.
Documentation best practices:
- Write runbooks for common procedures
- Document troubleshooting steps
- Keep architecture diagrams current
- Record decision-making rationale
- Maintain change logs and release notes
The 3 AM test: If you can’t follow your own documentation at 3 AM while half-asleep, it needs improvement.
Conclusion: The DevOps Mindset
These 25 rules represent hard-earned wisdom from the DevOps community. They’re not just technical guidelines—they’re a philosophy for building reliable, maintainable systems while preserving your sanity and career longevity.
The common threads running through all these rules are:
- Pragmatism over perfection: Focus on what works reliably
- Preparation over reaction: Plan for failure and have tested recovery procedures
- Communication over isolation: Share knowledge and build relationships
- Automation over manual processes: Reduce human error and improve consistency
- Learning over knowing: Stay curious and adapt to new challenges
Remember, becoming a great DevOps engineer isn’t just about mastering tools and technologies—it’s about developing the judgment to make good decisions under pressure, the discipline to follow best practices even when they’re inconvenient, and the wisdom to know when to break the rules.
Your journey in DevOps will be filled with 3 AM wake-up calls, mysterious system failures, and moments of brilliant problem-solving. These rules won’t prevent all the challenges, but they’ll help you handle them with confidence and professionalism.
The best DevOps engineers aren’t the ones who never encounter problems—they’re the ones who solve problems efficiently, learn from failures, and build systems that fail gracefully. Follow these principles, and you’ll be well on your way to joining their ranks.
What rules would you add to this list? Share your hard-earned DevOps wisdom in the comments below.
Additional Hard-Learned DevOps Wisdom
• Observability is not just monitoring - it’s about understanding why your system behaves the way it does
The observability difference: Monitoring tells you what’s happening, observability tells you why it’s happening.
The three pillars of observability:
- Metrics: What happened and when
- Logs: Detailed context about events
- Traces: How requests flow through your system
Implementation strategies:
- Implement distributed tracing for microservices
- Use structured logging with consistent formats
- Create custom metrics for business logic
- Build dashboards that tell a story, not just display data
- Set up synthetic monitoring to catch issues before users do
Pro tip: If you can’t quickly answer “why is this happening?” when looking at an alert, you need better observability.
• Your staging environment will never be exactly like production, and that’s okay - just make it close enough to catch the big problems
The staging reality: Perfect staging environments are expensive and often impossible. Focus on catching the issues that matter most.
Staging environment priorities:
- Same infrastructure patterns and scaling constraints
- Production-like data volumes and types
- Realistic network latency and connectivity
- Similar security configurations
- Proper load testing capabilities
What you can live with being different:
- Exact data replication (use anonymized subsets)
- Full geographic distribution
- Complete third-party integrations
- Exact scaling ratios
The 80/20 rule: Catch 80% of production issues with 20% of production’s complexity.
• Always have a “break glass” procedure for emergency access, but make sure it’s audited and time-limited
Emergency access philosophy: Plan for the scenario where your normal access methods fail during a critical incident.
Break glass requirements:
- Documented emergency access procedures
- Time-limited credentials (automatically expire)
- Full audit logging of emergency access usage
- Multiple approval requirements for activation
- Regular testing of emergency procedures
Common scenarios requiring break glass:
- Identity provider failures
- Network connectivity issues
- Automation system failures
- Mass credential compromises
Post-incident requirements: Every break glass usage should trigger a post-mortem to understand why normal access failed.
• Performance problems are usually N+1 queries, memory leaks, or poor caching - start with the boring stuff before looking for exotic solutions
The performance debugging hierarchy: Most performance issues are caused by common, well-understood problems.
The usual suspects (in order of likelihood):
- Database N+1 query problems
- Memory leaks and garbage collection issues
- Poor or missing caching strategies
- Unoptimized database queries
- Resource contention and locking
- Network latency and timeout issues
Debugging methodology:
- Start with application profiling and database query analysis
- Check memory usage patterns and garbage collection metrics
- Analyze cache hit rates and invalidation patterns
- Look at resource utilization during peak loads
- Only then consider exotic solutions or architectural changes
The exotic solution trap: Don’t immediately jump to microservices, caching layers, or architectural rewrites when the issue might be a missing database index.
• Your infrastructure should be cattle, not pets - if you can’t delete it and recreate it, you’re doing it wrong
The cattle vs. pets philosophy: Treat servers and infrastructure components as replaceable rather than unique and precious.
Cattle characteristics:
- Automatically provisioned and configured
- Identical and interchangeable
- Easily replaced when they fail
- No manual configuration or customization
- Stateless or with externalized state
Pet elimination strategies:
- Use Infrastructure as Code for all provisioning
- Implement immutable infrastructure patterns
- Externalize all persistent state
- Automate configuration management
- Practice regular infrastructure refresh cycles
Signs you have pets: Servers with names, manual configuration, “it works, don’t touch it” mentality, or fear of rebooting systems.
• Implement circuit breakers for all external dependencies - your system’s reliability can’t be worse than your weakest dependency
The circuit breaker pattern: Protect your system from cascading failures caused by unreliable external services.
Circuit breaker implementation:
- Detect when external services are failing
- Stop making requests to failing services temporarily
- Allow occasional test requests to check if service has recovered
- Implement fallback behavior when services are unavailable
- Monitor and alert on circuit breaker state changes
Dependency reliability math: If you depend on three services that are each 99% reliable, your maximum reliability is 99% × 99% × 99% = 97%.
Fallback strategies:
- Cached responses for read operations
- Graceful degradation of functionality
- Default values or simplified responses
- Queue requests for later processing
• Log everything, but make sure your logs are searchable and structured - unstructured logs are just expensive noise
Structured logging principles: Logs should be machine-readable and consistently formatted.
Structured logging requirements:
- Use consistent log formats (JSON is preferred)
- Include correlation IDs for request tracing
- Log at appropriate levels (DEBUG, INFO, WARN, ERROR)
- Include relevant context (user ID, request ID, business context)
- Avoid logging sensitive information
Log aggregation strategy:
- Centralized log collection and storage
- Powerful search and filtering capabilities
- Log retention policies based on importance
- Automated log analysis and anomaly detection
- Integration with alerting systems
The searchability test: If you can’t quickly find relevant logs during an incident, your logging strategy needs improvement.
• Automate your compliance and security scanning - manual security reviews are too slow and inconsistent
Security automation philosophy: Security should be built into your pipeline, not bolted on afterward.
Automated security practices:
- Static code analysis in CI/CD pipelines
- Dependency vulnerability scanning
- Container image security scanning
- Infrastructure compliance checking
- Automated penetration testing
- Secret detection in code repositories
Compliance automation:
- Policy as Code implementation
- Automated compliance reporting
- Continuous audit trails
- Automated remediation for common issues
- Regular compliance validation
The shift-left approach: Find and fix security issues as early in the development process as possible.
• Your on-call rotation should be sustainable - burned out engineers make bad decisions and more mistakes
On-call sustainability principles: Protecting your team’s well-being protects your system’s reliability.
Sustainable on-call practices:
- Reasonable rotation schedules (1 week maximum)
- Clear escalation procedures
- Comprehensive runbooks and documentation
- Post-incident recovery time
- On-call compensation and time off
Burnout prevention:
- Limit after-hours pages to true emergencies
- Invest in system reliability to reduce incidents
- Provide mental health resources and support
- Regular on-call feedback and improvement sessions
- Clear boundaries between on-call and regular work
The feedback loop: Use on-call experiences to prioritize system improvements and automation.
• Always have a rollback strategy, but also have a “fix forward” strategy - sometimes rolling back makes things worse
Deployment strategy diversity: Different types of problems require different response strategies.
When to roll back:
- New deployment introduces critical bugs
- Performance regressions are unacceptable
- Security vulnerabilities are introduced
- Data integrity is at risk
When to fix forward:
- Database schema changes that can’t be reversed
- Data migrations that have already completed
- Dependencies that other systems rely on
- Time-sensitive business requirements
Hybrid approaches:
- Feature flags to disable problematic functionality
- Blue-green deployments with traffic shifting
- Canary releases with automatic rollback triggers
- Database migration strategies that work in both directions
Cheers,
Sim